% of Peo­ple With African Heritage


Afghanistan: 0.018%
Alba­nia: 3.155%
Alge­ria: 98%
Amer­i­can Samoa: 0.149%
Andorra: 0.012%
Angola: 98.649%
Anguilla: 90.08%
Antigua and Bar­buda: 92%
Argentina: 0.124%
Arme­nia: 0.002%
Aruba: 24.038%
Aus­tralia: 1.399%
Aus­tria: 0.12%
Azer­bai­jan: 0.012%

Bahamas: 85%
Bahrain: 15%
Bangladesh: 0.315%
Bar­ba­dos: 90%
Belarus: 0.001%
Bel­gium: 0.703%
Belize: 31.25%
Benin: 96.926%
Bermuda: 61.538%
Bhutan: 0.008%
Bolivia: 1.155%
Bosnia and Herze­gov­ina: 0.003%
Botswana: 95.643%
Brazil: 45.26%
British Vir­gin Islands: 86.957%
Brunei: 0.1%
Bul­garia: 0.001%
Burk­ina Faso: 93.156%
Burundi: 97.675%

Cam­bo­dia: 0.007%
Cameroon: 98.161%
Canada: 2.995%
Cape Verde: 68%
Cay­man Islands: 63.83%
Cen­tral African Repub­lic: 98.8%
Chad: 88%
Chile: 0.119%
China: 0.008%
Colom­bia: 21.308%
Comoros: 90.909%
Congo-​Brazzaville: 92.887%
Cook Islands: 0.99%
Costa Rica: 3.133%
Côte d’Ivoire: 85.94%
Croa­tia: 0.002%
Cuba: 62%
Cyprus: 0.629%
Czech Repub­lic: 0.005%

Demo­c­ra­tic Repub­lic of the Congo: 98.091%
Den­mark: 0.547%
Dji­bouti: 96.478%
Dominica: 93%
Domini­can Repub­lic: 84%


East Timor: 0.009%
Ecuador: 3%
Egypt: 99.6%
El Sal­vador: 0.012%
Equa­to­r­ial Guinea: 97.81%
Eritrea: 98.659%
Esto­nia: 0.007%
Ethiopia: 98.261%


Falk­land Islands: 0.333%
Faroe Islands: 0.205%
Fiji: 1.208%
Fin­land: 0.019%
France: 9.306%
French Guiana: 66%
French Poly­ne­sia: 0.385%


Gabon: 81.3%
Gam­bia: 83.71%
Geor­gia: 0.023%
Ger­many: 0.73%
Ghana: 91.452%
Gibral­tar: 5%
Greece: 0.27%
Green­land: 0.017%
Grenada: 95%
Guade­loupe: 92%
Guam: 0.006%
Guatemala: 2%
Guernsey: 0.152%
Guinea: 94.682%
Guinea-​Bissau: 99.5%
Guyana: 36%


Haiti: 97.5%
Hon­duras: 2%
Hong Kong: 0.036%
Hun­gary: 0.01%


Ice­land: 0.031%
India: 2.5%
Indone­sia: 0.002%
Iran: 0.001%
Iraq: 0.034%
Ire­land: 0.226%
Isle of Man: 0.125%
Israel: 25.2%
Italy: 1.3%


Jamaica: 97.4%
Japan: 0.004%
Jer­sey: 0.112%
Jor­dan: 0.017%


Kaza­khstan: 0.001%
Kenya: 97.993%
Kiri­bati: 1.053%
Kuwait: 2%
Kyr­gyzs­tan: 0.002%


Laos: 0.017%
Latvia: 0.004%
Lebanon: 0.098%
Lesotho: 98.666%
Liberia: 97.477%
Libya: 97%
Liecht­en­stein: 2.828%
Lithua­nia: 0.003%
Lux­em­bourg: 0.207%


Macau: 0.186%
Mace­do­nia: 0.049%
Mada­gas­car: 98.661%
Malawi: 96.835%
Malaysia: 5%
Mal­dives: 3%
Mali: 98.66%
Malta: 0.024%
Mar­shall Islands: 0.017%
Mar­tinique: 72%
Mau­ri­ta­nia: 96.849%
Mau­ri­tius: 97%
May­otte: 91%
Mex­ico: 1.09%
Microne­sia: 0.901%
Moldova: 0.003%
Monaco: 0.303%
Mon­go­lia: 0.004%
Mon­tene­gro: 0.017%
Montser­rat: 65%
Morocco: 99%
Mozam­bique: 96.949%
Myan­mar: 0.01%


Namibia: 91.959%
Nauru: 1%
Nepal: 0%
Nether­lands: 1.823%
Nether­lands Antilles: 85%
New Cale­do­nia: 0.041%
New Zealand: 0.023%
Nicaragua: 9%
Niger: 98.112%
Nige­ria: 98.262%
Niue: 0.063%
North Korea: 0%
North­ern Mar­i­ana Islands: 0.119%
Nor­way: 0.021%


Oman: 8%


Pak­istan: 4.5%
Palau: 0.5%
Pales­tine: 2.33%
Panama: 14%
Papua New Guinea: 94.772%
Paraguay: 0.1%
Peru: 3%
Philip­pines: 0.01%
Pit­cairn Islands: 2%
Poland: 0.02%
Por­tu­gal: 2%
Puerto Rico: 8%


Qatar: 0.9%


Réu­nion: 68%
Roma­nia: 0.005%
Rus­sia: 0.014%
Rwanda: 97.661%


Saint Helena: 50%
Saint Kitts and Nevis: 98%
Saint Lucia: 82.5%
Saint Vin­cent and the Grenadines: 85%
Saint-​Barthélemy: 27.4%
Saint-​Martin: 53.5%
Saint-​Pierre and Miquelon: 0.163%
Samoa: 0.53%
San Marino: 0.032%
São Tomé and Príncipe: 93.8%
Saudi Ara­bia: 10%
Sene­gal: 96.204%
Ser­bia: 0.001%
Sey­chelles: 94%
Sierra Leone: 96.846%
Sin­ga­pore: 0.022%
Slo­va­kia: 0.002%
Slove­nia: 0.005%
Solomon Islands: 0.02%
Soma­lia: 95.573%
Soma­liland: 99%
South Africa: 98.6%
South Korea: 0.002%
Spain: 1.3%
Sri Lanka: 1.8%
Sudan: 97.273%
Suri­name: 47%
Swazi­land: 97%
Swe­den: 0.217%
Switzer­land: 0.327%
Syria: 0.1%


Tai­wan: 0.004%
Tajik­istan: 0.001%
Tan­za­nia: 96.934%
Thai­land: 0.002%
Togo: 96.022%
Toke­lau: 2.857%
Tonga: 10%
Trinidad and Tobago: 58%
Tunisia: 99.6%
Turkey: 4.25%
Turk­menistan: 0.002%
Turks and Caicos Islands: 34%
Tuvalu: 0.091%


U.S. Vir­gin Islands: 78%
Uganda: 97.124%
Ukraine: 0%
United Arab Emi­rates: 8.8%
United King­dom: 3%
United States of Amer­ica: 12.9%
Uruguay: 4%
Uzbek­istan: 0%


Van­u­atu: 0.044%
Vat­i­can City: 12.5%
Venezuela: 18.25%
Viet­nam: 0.1%


Wal­lis and Futuna: 0.667%
West­ern Sahara: 99%



Yemen: 35%


Zam­bia: 96.643%
Zim­babwe: 95.072%



Global: 34.227%

Related arti­cle
What is African?
The Issue of Race

Skype Us

AV Search by Google


Most Recent Articles

Afghanistan Val­ues and World Cul­tural Exchange

DATE OF INDE­PEN­DENCE: August 19, 1919
LAN­GUAGE: Dari; Pashto; Turk­ish


Ahmad Shah Saduzay is con­sid­ered by some the father of Afghanistan and the founder of the Afghan nation. The land spans across South­ern Asia, north and west of Pak­istan, east of Iran. Its cap­i­tal is Kabul, and most of the coun­try is sparsely pop­u­lated. The nation name, “Afghanistan” is rel­a­tively recent. In ancient times, the land was known as Ari­ana and Bac­tria and it was named Kho­rasan in the Mid­dle Ages. Like all nations, Afghanistan’s geog­ra­phy has played a cen­tral role in its his­tory. Rel­a­tively inac­ces­si­ble, the moun­tain­ous coun­try is land­locked, and is sur­rounded by Pak­istan, Iran, Turk­menistan, Uzbek­istan, Tajik­istan, and China.


Afghans are a diverse mix of peo­ple with dif­fer­ent back­ground across the ages. They have his­tor­i­cally inher­ited a cross­bred vari­a­tion of Indian, Per­sian, Ara­bic, Greek, Turk­ish and Mon­go­lian genes.


Afghanistan main eth­nic groups are Pash­tun, 42 per­cent; Tajik, 27 per­cent; Haz­ara, 9 per­cent; Uzbek, 9 per­cent; Aimak (a Persian-​speaking nomadic group), 4 per­cent; Turk­men, 3 per­cent; and Baloch, 2 percent.


The peo­ple of Afghanistan are gov­erned by strict Islamic religious-​agenda. Although, Afghanistan has one of the old­est world his­tor­i­cal relics, namely the Bud­dhas of Bamyan, the coun­try is not a typ­i­cal tourist des­ti­na­tion. Much of this could be attrib­uted to the lack of ade­quate infra­struc­ture. This in turn could be attrib­uted to insta­bil­ity due to a long stand­ing record of Anglo-​Afghan bel­liger­ence and domes­tic feud. The atmos­phere is tense, due to the pres­ence of for­eign mil­i­tary occu­pa­tion and domes­tic feuds between polit­i­cal rivalry and reli­gious fun­da­men­tal­ists. The Afghans in gen­eral are resilient and remain hope­ful that the cri­sis that has caused so much pain to so many peo­ple shall one day come to pass.


Archae­o­log­i­cal evi­dence indi­cates that urban civ­i­liza­tion began in the region occu­pied by mod­ern Afghanistan between 3000 and 2000 B.C. The first his­tor­i­cal doc­u­ments date from the early part of the Iran­ian Achaemen­ian Dynasty, which con­trolled the region from 550 B.C. until 331 B.C. Between 330 and 327 B.C., Alexan­der the Great defeated the Achaemen­ian emperor Dar­ius III and sub­dued local resis­tance in the ter­ri­tory that is now Afghanistan. Alexan­der suc­ces­sors, the Seleu­cids, con­tin­ued to infuse the region with Greek cul­tural influ­ence. Shortly there­after, the Mau­ryan Empire of India gained con­trol of south­ern Afghanistan, bring­ing with it Bud­dhism. In the mid-​third cen­tury B.C., nomadic Kushans estab­lished an empire that became a cul­tural and com­mer­cial cen­ter. From the end of the Kushan Empire in the third cen­tury A.D. until the sev­enth cen­tury, the region was frag­mented and under the gen­eral pro­tec­tion of the Iran­ian Sas­san­ian Empire.

After defeat­ing the Sas­sa­ni­ans at the Bat­tle of Qadisiya in 637, Arab Mus­lims began a 100-​year process of con­quer­ing the Afghan tribes and intro­duc­ing Islam. In 1919 Afghanistan signed the Treaty of Rawalpindi, which ended the Third Anglo-​Afghan War and marks Afghanistan offi­cial date of inde­pen­dence. In the inter­war period, Afghanistan again was a bal­anc­ing point between two world pow­ers; Habibul­lah son Aman­ul­lah (ruled 191929) skill­fully manip­u­lated the new British-​Soviet rivalry and estab­lished rela­tions with major coun­tries. Aman­ul­lah intro­duced his coun­try first con­sti­tu­tion in 1923. How­ever, resis­tance to his domes­tic reform pro­gram forced his abdi­ca­tion in 1929. In 1933 Aman­ul­lah nephew Moham­mad Zahir Shah, the last king of Afghanistan, began a 40-​year reign.

A new con­sti­tu­tion, rat­i­fied in 1964, lib­er­al­ized some­what the con­sti­tu­tional monar­chy while eco­nomic and polit­i­cal con­di­tions wors­ened. In 1979 the threat of tribal insur­gency against the com­mu­nist gov­ern­ment trig­gered an inva­sion by 80,000 Soviet troops, who then endured a very effec­tive decade-​long guer­rilla war. Between 1979 and 1989, two Soviet-​sponsored regimes failed to defeat the loose fed­er­a­tion of Mujahideen guer­ril­las that opposed the occu­pa­tion. In 1988 the Soviet Union agreed to cre­ate a neu­tral Afghan state, and the last Soviet troops left Afghanistan in 1989. In 1992 Afghanistan descended into a civil war that fur­ther rav­aged the econ­omy and cre­ated power strug­gles among sev­eral armed groups. An Islamic fun­da­men­tal­ist group, the Tal­iban, gained con­trol of most of the coun­try in 1996 and began assert­ing repres­sive con­trol of soci­ety in effort to rid the Afghans off cer­tain for­eign influ­ence, espe­cially west­ern civ­i­liza­tion. Ignor­ing an inter­na­tional out­cry, Supreme Com­man­der of the Tal­iban Mul­lah Moham­mad Omar ordered the destruc­tion of all non Islamic religious-​statues in Afghanistan. The destruc­tion of scores of pre-​Islamic fig­ures, includ­ing the centuries-​old Bud­dha in Bamiyan, ensued in cam­paign to stop the wor­ship­ing of “false idols,” through­out the country.

Afghanistan’s puri­tan­i­cal Tal­iban wel­comed Islamic fun­da­men­tal­ist groups, includ­ing the Arab ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion al Qaeda in Afghanistan. As al Qaeda com­mit­ted a series of inter­na­tional ter­ror­ist acts cul­mi­nat­ing in attacks on the United States on Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001, the Tal­iban rejected inter­na­tional pres­sure to sur­ren­der al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. When the United States and allies attacked Afghanistan in the fall of 2001, the Tal­iban gov­ern­ment col­lapsed, but Tal­iban and al Qaeda lead­ers escaped. And, the United States–led Inter­na­tional Secu­rity Assis­tance Force invaded Afghanistan and help install a new government.


There is a large pres­ence and long his­tory of Arabs in Afghanistan. Some of these eth­nic Arabs are from Africa. The rela­tion­ship span sev­eral cen­turies from eth­nic Arab fight­ers who migrated to the area dur­ing con­flicts dat­ing back from the 7th cen­tury till the recent Soviet-​Afghan War when they assisted fel­low Mus­lims in fight­ing the Sovi­ets and pro-​Soviet Afghans. There has been more pres­ence of peo­ple of African descent in Afghanistan since the Amer­i­can inva­sion in 2002, mostly in mil­i­tary ser­vice, human­i­tar­ian orga­ni­za­tion ser­vices or rare inci­dent of tourism.


As Afghanistan strug­gles with mod­ern dilem­mas, how­ever, it con­tin­ues to exhibit intense tribal and wide­spread eco­nomic hard­ship increas­ingly weak­ened the new gov­ern­ment sup­port among the pop­u­la­tion. Cor­rup­tion and nepo­tism is preva­lent in the government.

A major inter­nal secu­rity fac­tor has been crim­i­nal and ter­ror­ist activ­ity asso­ci­ated with the pros­per­ous drug trade. Drug-​processing lab­o­ra­to­ries are located through­out the coun­try, tra­di­tional infor­mal finan­cial net­works laun­der nar­cotics prof­its, and some provin­cial and national gov­ern­ment offi­cials have been impli­cated in the drug trade.

Afghanistan had the high­est pro­por­tion of wid­ows and orphans (respec­tively, 1 mil­lion and 1.6 mil­lion in 2005) in the world. Large num­bers of dis­abled indi­vid­u­als and for­mer mem­bers of regional mili­tias also lack a means of sup­port. The gov­ern­ment has pro­vided very lit­tle wel­fare pro­tec­tion. Most of the wel­fare activ­ity in the coun­try has been pro­vided by inter­na­tional non­govern­men­tal orga­ni­za­tions (NGOs), such as the Afghan Health and Devel­op­ment Ser­vices, Afghan Women Edu­ca­tion Cen­ter, and human­i­tar­ian Assis­tance for the Women and Chil­dren of Afghanistan, and by United Nations orga­ni­za­tions. NGOs also work with Afghan refugees in other coun­tries, espe­cially Pak­istan.


The Bonn Agree­ment of 2001 estab­lished the Afghan Inde­pen­dent Human Rights Com­mis­sion (AIHRC) to inves­ti­gate human rights abuses and war crimes. In 2005 the gov­ern­ment passed a three-​year Action Plan on Peace, Rec­on­cil­i­a­tion and Jus­tice in Afghanistan, whose goals were sup­posed to be met by the end of 2008. Those goals included doc­u­men­ta­tion of crimes com­mit­ted since the Soviet inva­sion of 1979, pros­e­cu­tion of human rights vio­la­tors, and com­pen­sa­tion of vic­tims families.

How­ever, as of mid-​2008 the gov­ern­ment had made only lit­tle progress toward ful­fill­ing the plan. In the early 2000s, some types of human rights vio­la­tions con­tin­ued, par­tic­u­larly out­side the region con­trolled by the cen­tral gov­ern­ment. The National Secu­rity Direc­torate, Afghanistan national secu­rity agency, has been accused of run­ning its own pris­ons, tor­tur­ing sus­pects, and harass­ing jour­nal­ists. The secu­rity forces of local mili­tias, which also have their own pris­ons, have been accused of tor­ture and arbi­trary killings. War­lords in the north have used prop­erty destruc­tion, rape, and mur­der to dis­cour­age dis­placed Pash­tuns from reclaim­ing their homes. Child labor and traf­fick­ing in peo­ple remain com­mon out­side Kabul. Civil­ians fre­quently have been killed in bat­tles between war­lord forces. A prison reha­bil­i­ta­tion pro­gram began in 2003, but poor con­di­tions in the over­crowded pris­ons have con­tributed to ill­ness and death among pris­on­ers. In the absence of an effec­tive national judi­cial sys­tem, the right to judi­cial pro­tec­tion has been com­pro­mised as uneven local stan­dards have pre­vailed in crim­i­nal trials.

The gov­ern­ment has lim­ited free­dom of the media by selec­tive crack­downs that invoke Islamic law, and self-​censorship of the media has been encour­aged. The media remain sub­stan­tially government-​owned. In 2004 a media law nom­i­nally lifted restric­tions on some media activ­ity but con­tin­ued to for­bid crit­i­ciz­ing Islam or insult­ing offi­cials. Jour­nal­ists and legal experts crit­i­cized the nom­i­nally lesser restric­tions of the 2004 law, and harass­ment and threats con­tin­ued in 2008, espe­cially out­side Kabul. The com­mis­sion that over­sees the press includes no rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the news media, and the press law per­mits gov­ern­ment cen­sor­ship of the news. No reg­is­tra­tion of reli­gious groups is required; minor­ity reli­gious groups are able to prac­tice freely but not to proselytize.

Women right to work out­side the home, includ­ing polit­i­cal activ­ity, has received increas­ing accep­tance in the early 2000s. The con­sti­tu­tion of 2004 makes an explicit com­mit­ment to the advance­ment of women and to gen­der equal­ity, and 25 per­cent of the seats in the lower house of the National Assem­bly are des­ig­nated for women. How­ever, con­ser­v­a­tive ele­ments in the judi­ciary have demanded sep­a­rate edu­ca­tion and a strict dress code for women. In rural areas, the social sta­tus of women remains low. They are denied access to edu­ca­tion and jobs and often not allowed to leave their homes with­out a male rel­a­tive. An esti­mated 80 per­cent of Afghan women enter forced mar­riages. In the early 2000s, poverty forced many women to enter the sex trade; their num­ber is believed to have increased sig­nif­i­cantly since 2001, when it was esti­mated at 25,000.



• Afghan Net­work
• Afghan Con­nec­tion and Gems from Cen­tral Asia
• Afghan News Chan­nel


AUTHOR: Wale Idris
CON­TACT: This email address is being pro­tected from spam­bots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
PHONE: 6462260262


Library of Con­gress Fed­eral Research Divi­sion
The United Nations
African Views
Ber­tels­mann Foun­da­tion
Con­trib­u­tors like you
Econ­o­mist Intel­li­gence Unit
Every cul­ture
Free­dom House
Her­itage Foun­da­tion


Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment Indi­ca­tors for Afghanistan in details:

The chang­ing pro­files of a soci­ety in this nation or ter­ri­tory are cap­tured through a host of vital sta­tis­ti­cal indi­ca­tors. African Views facil­i­tates these sta­tis­ti­cal indi­ca­tors for every­one to iden­tify, com­pare and express their agree­ment or dis­agree­ment about the rat­ings, as well as share your views on a host of national con­di­tions and issues. Your con­tri­bu­tion will go towards the col­lec­tive knowl­edge and wis­dom required to explore empir­i­cal from nor­ma­tive argu­ments, espe­cially those argu­ments that rely on hid­den or ques­tion­able principles.

Add comment

Security code

Inspiration for Leadership

more Quotes


The World Is Listening

Sign in with Facebook


Upcoming Events

No events found.


Who’s Online

We have 624 guests and no mem­bers online